Touch feedback manifests in some ugly black border bleeding out of the thumbnail
itself. Since we already provide feedback (be that by adding the blue border in
case of pinning, or showing the menu in case of long press) the perception is
the same, without the graphical glitch.

They are part of the Jitsi font now, there is no need to load them from
FontAwesome.

* feat(tile-view): initial implementation for mobile

- Create a tile view component for displaying thumbnails in a
  two-dimensional grid.
- Update the existing TileViewButton so it shows a label in the
  overflow menu.
- Modify conference so it can display TileView while hiding
  Filmstrip.
- Modify Thumbnail so its width/height can be set and to prevent
  pinning while in tile view mode.

* use style array for thumbnail styles

* change ternary to math.min for expressiveness

* use dimensiondetector

* pass explicit disableTint prop

* use makeAspectRatioAware instead of aspectRatio prop

* update docs

* fix docs again (fix laziest copy/paste job I've ever done)

* large-video: rename onPress prop to onClick

* change forEach to for...of

* use truthy check fallthrough logic instead of explicit if

* put tile view button second to last in menu

* move spacer to a constant

* the magical incantation to make flow shut up

This zOrder change fixes the issue that the scrollable filmstrip videos
rendered in front of the local participant, however there is still an
issue that needs to be fixed later: The rendered videos should have
overflow: 'hidden' property applied so then they don't get rendered when
scrolled out of the ScrollView, that property however doesn't seem to
work for Video components.

Contributing all buttons in one place goes against the designs that we
set out at the beginning of the project's rewrite and that multiple of
us have been following since then.

The files styles.js are used (pretty much) on React Native only and each
of them exports 1 name. Export it as default to cut down on source code.

We seemed to be using the names "film strip" and "filmstrip" (and,
consequently, their source code-conscious forms such as film-strip,
FilmStrip, etc.) In order to comply with our coding style which requires
a consistent one name for a given abstraction, choose one name and
rename the uses of the other name.

Wikipedia has a definition of a "filmstrip", I couldn't find a "film
strip". I guess our abstraction can be seen as what's described there.
When I google "film strip", I get results about "filmstrip" at the top.
That's why I chose "filmstrip".

Certain uses of "film strip" such as interfaceConfig.filmStripOnly and
in the external API I left untouched in an attempt to preserve
compatibility.

I wasn't sure whether CSS was tangled in compatibility so I made a
choice and renamed there was well.