A few occurrences of coding style/formatting which I noticed while
reviewing 'feat(eslint): Enable for non react files'. These are
definitely not all occurrences I could've noticed during the review
but... we're talking about files outside react/ anyway.

Instead have VideoLayout reach into redux.

- Re-use the native redux pinning implementation for web
- Remove pinning logic from conference.js
- To the native pinning add a check for sharedVideo so
  youtube videos do not send a pin event
- Add shared videos as a participant to enable pinning and
  so they can eventually get added to the filmstrip
- Emit UIEvents.PINNED_ENDPOINT from middleware

We seemed to be using the names "film strip" and "filmstrip" (and,
consequently, their source code-conscious forms such as film-strip,
FilmStrip, etc.) In order to comply with our coding style which requires
a consistent one name for a given abstraction, choose one name and
rename the uses of the other name.

Wikipedia has a definition of a "filmstrip", I couldn't find a "film
strip". I guess our abstraction can be seen as what's described there.
When I google "film strip", I get results about "filmstrip" at the top.
That's why I chose "filmstrip".

Certain uses of "film strip" such as interfaceConfig.filmStripOnly and
in the external API I left untouched in an attempt to preserve
compatibility.

I wasn't sure whether CSS was tangled in compatibility so I made a
choice and renamed there was well.

Enable ESLint on jitsi-meet with the same configuration and the same
goals as in lib-jitsi-meet.