For the most part the changes are taking the "static propTypes" declaration off
of components and declaring them as Flow types. Sometimes to support flow some
method signatures had to be added. There are some exceptions in which more had
to be done to tame the beast:
- AbstractVideoTrack: put in additional truthy checks for videoTrack.
- Video: add truthy checks for the _videoElement ref.
- shouldRenderVideoTrack function: Some component could pass null for the
  videoTrack argument and Flow wanted that called out explicitly.
- DisplayName: Add a truthy check for the input ref before acting on it.
- NumbersList: Move array checks inline for Flow to comprehend array methods
  could be called. Add type checks in the Object.entries loop as the value is
  assumed to be a mixed type by Flow.
- AbstractToolbarButton: add additional truthy check for passed in type.

BaseApp does all the heavy-lifting related to creating the redux store,
navigation, and so on.

App currently handles URL props and actually triggering navigation based on
them.

* Javadoc introduced @code as a replacement of <code> and <tt> which is
  better aligned with other javadoc tags such as @link. Use it in the
  Java source code. If we switch to Kotlin, then we'll definitely use
  Markdown.

* There are more uses of @code in the JavaScript source code than <tt>
  so use @code for the sake of consistency. Eventually, I'd rather we
  switch to Markdown because it's easier on my eyes.

* Xcode is plain confused by @code and @link. The Internet says that
  Xcode supports the backquote character to denote the beginning and end
  of a string of characters which should be formatted for display as
  code but it doesn't work for me. <tt> is not rendered at all. So use
  the backquote which is rendered itself. Hopefully, if we switch to
  Markdown, then it'll be common between JavaScript and Objective-C
  source code.

The basic indicator is extracted into a LoadingIndicator component,
which then NetworkActivityIndicator displays (or not) based on network
activity.

I'm not saying that the two commits in question were wrong or worse than
what I'm offering. Anyway, I think what I'm offering brings:

* Compliance with expectations i.e. the middleware doesn't compute the
next state from the current state, the reducer does;

* Clarity and/or simplicity i.e. there's no global variable (reqIndex),
there's no need for the term "index" (a.k.a "reqIndex") in the redux
store.

* By renaming net-interceptor to network-activity feels like it's
preparing the feature to implement a NetworkActivityIndicator React
Component which will take on more of the knowledge about the specifics
of what is the network activity redux state exactly, is it maintained by
interception or some other mechanism, and abstracts it in the feature
itself allowing outsiders to merely render a React Component.