We seemed to be using the names "film strip" and "filmstrip" (and,
consequently, their source code-conscious forms such as film-strip,
FilmStrip, etc.) In order to comply with our coding style which requires
a consistent one name for a given abstraction, choose one name and
rename the uses of the other name.

Wikipedia has a definition of a "filmstrip", I couldn't find a "film
strip". I guess our abstraction can be seen as what's described there.
When I google "film strip", I get results about "filmstrip" at the top.
That's why I chose "filmstrip".

Certain uses of "film strip" such as interfaceConfig.filmStripOnly and
in the external API I left untouched in an attempt to preserve
compatibility.

I wasn't sure whether CSS was tangled in compatibility so I made a
choice and renamed there was well.

https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/pull/1397 (React Toolbar) is huge at
the time of this writing. In order to reduce it, I'm extracting changes
not directly related to React-ifying the Toolbar such as added jsdocs
and source code formatting.

Until we make a decision on access modifier hints and adopt a respective
coding style, consistency is king.

Until we make a decision on access modifier hints and adopt a respective
coding style, consistency is king.

Don't use Array.prototype.sort() because (1) it operates in place and,
thus, mutes the Redux state and (2) it is not necessarily stable and,
thus, unnecessarily shuffles the thumbnails.

As an intermediate step on the path to merging jitsi-meet and
jitsi-meet-react, import the whole source code of jitsi-meet-react as it
stands at
2f23d98424
i.e. the lastest master at the time of this import. No modifications are
applied to the imported source code in order to preserve a complete
snapshot of it in the repository of jitsi-meet and, thus, facilitate
comparison later on. Consequently, the source code of jitsi-meet and/or
jitsi-meet-react may not work. For example, jitsi-meet's jshint may be
unable to parse jitsi-meet-react's source code.