* ref(Filmstrip): Optimize resizes.

* fix(thumbnails): resize.

* fix(thumbnails): Issue with height 0, width 0.

* doc(Filmstrip): Improve JSDoc.

This refactors all handling of audio-only and last N to 2 features in preparation
for "low bandwidth mode".

The main motivation to do this is that lastN is a "global" setting so it helps
to have all processing for it in a single place.

* ref(1-on-1): move remote visibility to a selector

Derive whether or not remote videos should display using a selector
to look across different states. A selector was chosen over using
memoized selectors (reselect) or subscribers as a first step
approach, avoiding additional mutations caused by a subscriber
updating the filmstrip state and avoiding additional api overhead
introduced by reselect.

* rename selector

The video status labels, which include recording and hd status,
have been moved back to the top left while in vertical filmstrip
mode. The following had to be done:
- Remove styling to move the labels to the bottom left
- For VideoStatusLabel, move filmstrip remote video count, toggle
  state, and 1:1 state into redux.
- Use middleware to emit out to the Recording label when the
  filmstrip changes.
- Create an empty Filmstrip file for web and identify the existing
  Filmstrip component as native.

We seemed to be using the names "film strip" and "filmstrip" (and,
consequently, their source code-conscious forms such as film-strip,
FilmStrip, etc.) In order to comply with our coding style which requires
a consistent one name for a given abstraction, choose one name and
rename the uses of the other name.

Wikipedia has a definition of a "filmstrip", I couldn't find a "film
strip". I guess our abstraction can be seen as what's described there.
When I google "film strip", I get results about "filmstrip" at the top.
That's why I chose "filmstrip".

Certain uses of "film strip" such as interfaceConfig.filmStripOnly and
in the external API I left untouched in an attempt to preserve
compatibility.

I wasn't sure whether CSS was tangled in compatibility so I made a
choice and renamed there was well.

As an intermediate step on the path to merging jitsi-meet and
jitsi-meet-react, import the whole source code of jitsi-meet-react as it
stands at
2f23d98424
i.e. the lastest master at the time of this import. No modifications are
applied to the imported source code in order to preserve a complete
snapshot of it in the repository of jitsi-meet and, thus, facilitate
comparison later on. Consequently, the source code of jitsi-meet and/or
jitsi-meet-react may not work. For example, jitsi-meet's jshint may be
unable to parse jitsi-meet-react's source code.