feat(overlay): native feature removal + replaced PageReloadOverlay with PageReloadDialog

* feat: Drops filmStripOnly mode.

* squash: Let's make lint happy again.

* squash: Drop some css.

For the most part the changes are taking the "static propTypes" declaration off
of components and declaring them as Flow types. Sometimes to support flow some
method signatures had to be added. There are some exceptions in which more had
to be done to tame the beast:
- AbstractVideoTrack: put in additional truthy checks for videoTrack.
- Video: add truthy checks for the _videoElement ref.
- shouldRenderVideoTrack function: Some component could pass null for the
  videoTrack argument and Flow wanted that called out explicitly.
- DisplayName: Add a truthy check for the input ref before acting on it.
- NumbersList: Move array checks inline for Flow to comprehend array methods
  could be called. Add type checks in the Object.entries loop as the value is
  assumed to be a mixed type by Flow.
- AbstractToolbarButton: add additional truthy check for passed in type.

These modification are not necessarily directly related to the
containing PR, I merely saw them while reviewing the containing PR.

Prepares for the latest eslint & flow-related npm packages which cause
these errors.

Prepare for React 16.

We seemed to be using the names "film strip" and "filmstrip" (and,
consequently, their source code-conscious forms such as film-strip,
FilmStrip, etc.) In order to comply with our coding style which requires
a consistent one name for a given abstraction, choose one name and
rename the uses of the other name.

Wikipedia has a definition of a "filmstrip", I couldn't find a "film
strip". I guess our abstraction can be seen as what's described there.
When I google "film strip", I get results about "filmstrip" at the top.
That's why I chose "filmstrip".

Certain uses of "film strip" such as interfaceConfig.filmStripOnly and
in the external API I left untouched in an attempt to preserve
compatibility.

I wasn't sure whether CSS was tangled in compatibility so I made a
choice and renamed there was well.

In this case makes more sense to have overlay frame included in every overlay instead
of abstract class that implements the overlay frame and have to be extended by every
overlay. In addition, mapStateToProps isn't working well with inheritance.